PERTAMA Hunt Results
Jun 24th, 2008 |
Read KNizam for what happened and a few of the questions. Also, I wonder if they had prizes for creative team names, cus these guys Pressed & Clubed Nuts deserved one.
Open category: Max score- 115
- 115 - Liew Kok Seng, Dato Ramesh, Chong Foo Seong, Lim Kong Yew
- 111 - CK Loh, Tommy Ng, Lim Say Chye, Anuar Jeffri
- 111 - KK Chai, Margaret Sha, VK Chong, Vincent Woo
- 109 - Suhaimi Zainal Abidin, Venkateswaran Nagappan, Sakhivel Marymuthu, Eswaran Kanesalingam
- 109 - Yeap Heng Boon, Richard Si, Pava, Kumaran Nagapa
- 105 - Lim Pang Liang, Toh Liew Jin, Foo May Wan, Ng Sook Chan
- 105 - Ami Akhram Abdullah, Haslinda Shamsuddin, Siti Halina Ali, Hakim Amir.
- 104 - Amir Hamzah, Zahrol Kadir, Aziz Rahman, Sharifah Nur Laila Syed Ali
- 102 - Steven Arokiaraj, Sumita, Sanjay Abdullah, Rahmah
- 99 - Azmi Neemat, Mohamad Shariff Mohd Sarji, Zakir Mokri, Mohd Alwi Ghani
Linda said:
Hi Mike,
Our team got No. 7, can you include our names as well? Ami Akhram Abdullah, Haslinda Shamsuddin, Siti Halina Ali, Hakim Amir.
Thanks.
Shahrul Zain said:
This hunter got show some videos from the events too. Quite funny.
Shaz
Shahrul Zain said:
http://treasurehuntingmalaysia.blogspot.com/2008/06/kembara-pertama-treasure-hunt-2008-kl.html
KNizam said:
i really enjoyed the answer’s presentation session. very funny. well done coc for that ! hehe
arlan said:
hi all, just seeking your opinion.
i am the first-place winner in one of the categories. among the prizes promised are two digital cameras and two dryers. but the organisers stated that since my team has only two people, we will only be given one camera and one dryer. they said this is the standard practice in hunts that prizes in kind will not be given in full if the team does not comprise four people. is this true? what’s troubling me is that this decision was not conveyed to hunters before the hunt. appreciate any feedback.
KNizam Artwerk » Kembara PERTAMA 2008 - Confuse @ Karak Tan, Spaghetti Lunch @ Maran, Pulut Santan @ Temerloh, Engine Mati + Fuel Problem @ Kuantan & Lepak2 kat Cherating Legend Resort said:
[…] can also view all the top 10 winners here at michael pang’s blog […]
KNizam said:
arlan = did u pay for 4 or for 2 ya ?
arlan said:
We paid for 2. Even if its common practice to halve what is allocated for a team of 4, should this not be announced from the start?
KNizam said:
yup i agreed it should be annouce and make it clear at the start. kesian u all.
Venka said:
I think the prizes were published in the briefing notes given to all. There was nothing stating the prizes are according to the number of participants. I think the organizer should have made it clear or don’t publish them if they are not sure yet.
confused said:
i had my prize changed the very last minute also lor! This was 2 years ago at the uem hunt to seremban. we registered 4 hunters but when only 3 of us participated and won with only 1 mistake and when the results announced, the organizers took away one of the dvd players saying that “only 3 or you guys menang kan?”
we were supposed to have won 2K worth of prizes for being the champs but in the end perhaps we got less…
we did not complaint but merely asked why was it so, the answer was that “only 3 took part mah!”, period.
Mike said:
Rules, regulations, prizes and everything else once announced cannot be conditional. Winning teams should get everything that was allocated for the particular placings.
kok seng said:
Just to share, at the NPC Hunt to Melaka, i think, some years back, we went 3 pax and won. They had a funny system where there were 2 categories, Media and Open and allocated the Media as the overall winner who scored less than us (and 2 other teams who tied with us in the Open cat). We were declared 2nd and the other 2 teams who tied with us were 3rd and 4th ….yes, so confusing.
Anyway, because we ran 3 pax, the COC of all person advised the Organiser to give our team 3 items only and they happily kept the 4th for themselves (organisers not COC). It ended up that the 3rd and 4th placed teams had a greater total prize value than us…so much for rewarding the team that used less no. of brains.
In a more recent hunt, IBBM Hunt last year, again it happened, not just to the Open Cat but also to their own Members Cat where they gave out the prizes based on the no. of pax in the team although the entry fee was by per team and not by per pax!!! Some of the Members Cat teams were visible upset and later just grabbed the 4th item that was left on the prize table. Again, we and another team in the Open cat, who ran 3 pax were given only 3 items. When we brought up the matter, we were given the runaround on their rational and finally pointed to the ‘kepala’ who made the decision. He was in full attempt to avoid us. Unfortunate for them, our laywer uncle Chong was on hand to give them a thorough tongue lashing and ‘legal and PR implications advise’, only then did they grudgingly surrendered the 4 item to us and the other team. (this ‘extra’ prize items were subsequently donated to another charity body organising hunts as prizes in case you are wondering what was done for this ‘extra’ gain).
I also recall years back when the Machines were ever so dominant (and we were mere rookies back then) had stunned faces when the organisers discounted their hunt winnings ie. based on the no. pax and gave them only 3 dvds when all 4 were ready to be given away by the guest of honour. Again, I think that the prize value was then lower than the teams who came in behind them because of this ’short changed’ decision.
Well….its a way for the organisers to sapu these ‘extra’ prizes for tehmselves which more often than not are donated by generous corporations. DISGUSTING!!!!!
At last year’s AMC Hunt, which was clerked by Dato’ RR and me, the organisers also asked what should be done as one of the winning teams comprised 2 pax only was among the prize winners and it was 4 electrical items. We agreed that they deserved all 4 and was given to them without any fuss.
Give credit where its due!!!
Kok Seng
Jediraj said:
Guys , about the prizes for the Media Cat where Arlan said he and his other team mate was short changed is not something new.It has happened in many hunts where the panel feels that you pay 2 u get 2 . But he did get the RM 3 THOUSAND as stated . The organisers always cover themself with the “Decisions of the Judges and Organisers are Final” clause.I and my ream mate were suppose to win 4 (four) 29in TV’s on the DUNHILL hunt to Cerating but they Only gave us 2 coz there were only 2 of us in the team. Well Arlan , things like this happens and to whoever in the Open Category you might have made an MOU with , tell them in japanese “shito happenzo” On another note i must say that the hunt was very well organized and i must say SYABAS to the organisers of the PERTAMA hunt. Well done guys . Cheers and Happy Hunting to all you Hunters out there.”Kalau dah Rezeki kita ia tak kan kemana……….
cukupla said:
Dah makan, dah menang, dah sapu semua barang…dengan bayaran ciput nak komplen lagi ka? kalau organiser nak tipu dia orang buat awal lagi dah, buat apa nak tayang. Dia orang bukan janji apa2 pun. Bagi RM3,000+ hadiah tambahan 2 + 2 hamper lagi untuk bayaran dua peserta oklah tu. Mana tak adilnya.
Kami penah Juara, dapat hadiah tayar sebiji je, kami tak komplen, janji masuk hunt. Hunt bagus, kita puji. Tahun depan boleh dia orang buat lagi. Kalau kutuk, dia orang merajuk, kita yang tak masuk hunt. Tahniah pada penganjur.
RajKumar-MenInBlack said:
Didnt know about this website until today . Good site Mike , a place for hunters to grunt. I did take part in the PERTAMA hunt and didnt know about the prize structure execpt the Cash pRizes.I shall refrain from commenting on that issue but i would like to say something.In my few years of on and off hunting , Nothing gives me more pleasure then to see a Family with kids go up on stage and win say,,,, Number 15 or 16 ,and collect a Hamper together . The Glee on the kids eyes knowing that the won something as a family makes my Hunt day worthwile.The
RajKumar-MenInBlack said:
The PERTAMA hunt created a few of those rare magic moments.I wish to thank all those who made the hunt possible. To all the winners ,Congrats , and to Kok Seng ,Once again you have proven that you and your team are the SIFU’S.I
RajKumar-MenInBlack said:
The PERTAMA hunt created a few of those rare magic moments.I wish to thank all those who made the hunt possible. To all the winners ,Congrats , and to Kok Seng ,Once again you have proven that you and your team are the SIFU’S.
I Stand humbled before you guys . Happy Hunting .
still confused said:
It was good hunt at pertama, to say the least. btw arlan and his team were tied at 109 points with the second placed hunters…they won on count back, technicality it seems. in spirit they are NOT that vely good what?
After all they got everything oledi mah! still complaint, if still not happy then do not take part anymore lor!
The BIG question looms — ada MOU ka with an open team? If not y la zibuk2 minta lagi…he he he…how could a team of 2 win that ezi meh? maybe the extra prize for the “extra” team members lor!!!
Not Blurr said:
Maybe dis was the 1st time arlan won, dat’s y he makes such a big fuss! Understandbly….first time menang la, kan?
Well…lets go to NPC 08 Treasure Hunt to Penang in August and lets see for ourselves….whether arlan will still win or just bring back home a hamper….hehehe
Mike said:
Raj Kumar, thanks.
More than just grunts for the sake of it, I think most hunters give their comments on certain issues because like everyone else they just wants to see our hunt scene improve. I know there are CoCs and hunt organisers reading this blog and these are feedback for them to consider.
Funly Hunters said:
Mike…where you there at Pertama Hunt?
Btw, the champs were missing (was told gone back to kl the night b4) and did not take their prizes. Just a little waste i supposed because, if my memory served me well, they were the first perfect score winners at a hunt helmed by Huntmaster M.Govind Nair!
Some said he kasi chance with the question, thats why there was a perfect score…if not aiyoh!
You see, Govind is an above average coc who had many good hunts under his belt but this is the first time a perfect score winners emerged.
Rugila sikit…
A promotion 4 Govind’s coming soon hunt — National Press Club Hunt to Penang in August…should be interesting.
Mike said:
Funly, no I was not there.
The winning team came back because the next day they took part in another hunt down here in Klang Valley. They won that one too.
befair said:
i took part in the pertama hunt. i think the treasure questions are giveaway. hence precious time was saved for teams to concentrate on the route questions, that’s why many teams did well, even arriving at finish point three hours ahead of time.
befair said:
to still confused,
on teams having MOUs when there are more than one categories. the problem is real as there’s stopping teams from different categories from cooperating as they will not lose anything. this is something for COCs and organisers to ponder. perhaps the way out is to have completely or slightly different set of questions for each category, then teams will not be too keen to cooperate. what say u?
stop cheating said:
I took part in the Media Category of the Pertama Hunt and indeed it was a good hunt. However, I wonder if there is any way to stop all this MoU stuff. This constitutes outright cheating and having been in the hunt scene for years, we know who are those strong teams and those who CHEAT!!! It is common to see MIB, Chong & Gang, Blurr Squad and Karuppiah fight for the top spots. But suddenly, we have two unknowns winning! This is ridiculous. To add fuel to the fire, we noticed the one calles Arlan openly negotiating with those in the Open Category on the MoU. Patutlah fighting for the other two prizes…to be given as payment maybe!!! Stop being so bloody greedy and winning by CHEATING!!!!! To those regular hunters, u guys know we have spent a fortune in getting to the level we are today. Hard work, determination and sacrifice!!! NOT CHEATING LA DEI!!!!
curious said:
aiyoh,
first we have to congratulate the coc for an excellent job. not many complains about the tulips and other arrangement except that the prize giving was on the next day. we had to wait for a long time before we knew the results.
anyway Close An Eye in the media cat could have cheated but what about MIB?
why? the organising chairperson is the wife of one of the team members of MIB..and to think that MIB finised a good 3 hours before their time..mmmmm..something to ponder.
but only insurance MIB has is that they have won in the past where the organising chairperson was not the spouse of one of the team mates
stop cheating said:
May I humbly suggest that the next time we have treasure hunts with different categories, lets please have two sets of different questions to ensure these CHEATERS don’t do it again. Thank you
kroll said:
guys, maybe we shuld STOP ‘posting’ all those nasty comments regarding the Pertama hunt, yeah sometime “shito happenzo”, for me the Pertama hunt was a very good and well organised hunt, and further more this is their 1st time organising, they already ‘kasi us makan’ dinner, breakfast and lunch and good RM for the winners, what more??? lets us all congrat them laa rather than ‘kutuk2′… am i rite?
Mike said:
2 sets of different questions is a good idea. the question is, will CoC take the trouble?
zukri-MiB said:
Dear stop cheating…
Thanks 4 the fair comment. Appreciate it very much.
And yes, MiB has been having podium finishes so regularly that we have forgotten how many times they were. Other media hunters remember us walking up the podium so much so that they knew our team name by just identifying us!
Just two weeks prior to the Pertama Hunt, we took part in the Kompleks Sukan Negara (KSN) Media Hunt from Bukit Jalil to Kelab Golf Perangsang Templer in Templer’s Park.
Almost everybody was there at the hunt.
The CoC was a member of Time Out Solution and MiB had no relations WHATSOEVER with any of them and we got A PERFECT SCORE! repeat A PERFECT SCORE…
And that was NOT the first time we had A PERFECT SCORE, we did it for the third time (in our hunting experience) at the Malaysia Airport Holdings Berhad Media Hunt to Penang two years ago also with A PERFECT SCORE.
The last perfect score at the KSN hunt was the fourth!
Unless my memory failed me, I certainly do not remember the CoC Baskaran being a relative or any of my MiB members.
We won the first MAHB Hunt and came up second-placed in the Second MAHB Hunt and became champions at the fifth MAHB Hunt with a perfect score as I have illustrated above.
At one UEM Media Hunt only 3 MiB members hunted and we became champions. Again, the CoC Dahlan is NO relative of us.
Yes, the CoC of the Pertama Hunt is a member of the MiB because he was also hunting with us on numerous occasions and unfortunately we ended up at the Pertama Hunt second-placed.
The best part was that we were tied with the first-placed at 109 points a piece and since the CoC was an MiB then he could have easily made us the champions, isn’t it?
But he didn’t. The CoC was a pro.
He could have and nobody would question his decision since “judges’ decision is final” and the similar score would have easily given him the motive. But the CoC did not do that and we were second-placed.
The hunting MiB could have easily accused the organizing MiB of being unfair to his own teamates but then the CoC is a pro, period.
And those who know huntmaster M.Govind Nair knew very well his integrity and professionalism. Not only to question his integrity but to even think of questioning is unacceptable!
Govind goes by the book, its that simple. And so were the MiB.
However, the book did not specify the penalty for teams which had mou with any other teams in any other category. If they have done so at the Pertama Hunt and won then I would say welldone to them for being a cheat!
Cheaters are also Liars…right?
If you have to cheat to win then its just too bad! The MiB did not have to and will certainly never stoop that low to win.
Last year National Press Club Hunt to Lumut was also helmed by Govind and the MiB was also second-placed, in case some people have forgotten!
Again last year the MiB was second-placed at the MDEC Media Brand Hunt to Penang and I do not remember having any members of the MiB being a relative or Sam Rahman the CoC!
As for us to have been reported arriving earlier, it was NOT three hours before time, that was Mr Chong Foo Seong the eventual champions of the open category who arrived with his team at exactly 1.43 pm, as announced by the CoC.
Mr Chong had a perfect score and I do not think that he has any relation with Govind or any member of the organizing committee.
The MiB clocked in at 3.30pm, about half an hour before the counter was opened as was briefed to us in the morning prior to the flag-off.
It is OK to be curious as to how we have been regularly winning the media hunts over the last 5 years or so. But to link our position and our performance with any relative on the organizing committee side is UNFAIR both to us the MiB and the committee.
Any good hunter will know that its all hard work, determination and experience and definitely NOT an mou that got us to where we are today. One cannot afford to close one eye to win a hunt but must always be diligent and alert along the tuilps.
The problem with mou is when the time comes to split the spoilts of war! Most of the times greed will get in the way. As far as I knew, ALL regular treasure hunters, the media included frowned on the prospect of cheating or having mou with other teams even though with a different category participants.
Again, I must commend stop cheating, you have been fair to the MiB, Thank You.
The MiB have always been magnanimous in defeats and victories.
And we have NOT accused anybody of being a cheat but if there are cheaters at the Pertama Hunt then MiB was the victim, isn’t?
Our experience tells us that there were other CoCs helmig hunts while their teamates participates and if they win it was not because of “soalan bocor” or mou with the CoC or any other participants of anything whatsoever.
They won because they were good. And nobody will complaint or accuse some other teams of having relative or friend. This is all about professionalism in treasure hunting, period.
zukri-MiB…
stop cheating said:
Dear Kroll… we are not at ALL complaining about the hunt. As a professional hunter, the event was well organised and the COC was a fair person. We are only upset about the professionalism of the hunters and their low-down cheating habits. Kudos to the hunt organisers. Everything was good… from the food to the rooms and the prizes etc…
I suppose that when the going gets tough, the tough dont actually get going, but resort to other unprofessional means to get to the poduim. Anyway, to all those genuine hunters, we have earned what it takes and those in the game deep down know who the “GENUINE ONES” ones are and who the “CHEATS” are. If you feel good about yourself spending prize money which you obtained through dishonest means, then its up to you to deal with yourself! Dishonesty never pays and sooner or later it will catch up with u!! Kudos and may the hunt continue!!!
arlan said:
Dear all,
Thank you for your feedback on the question i posted. From what I gather, it appears that the consensus among the hunt fraternity is that prize allocation is ultimately up to the organisers. Granted, if that is the case, I accept the view. But there is seriously no need to resort to venomous sniping and character assassination (anwar sudah kena cukupla) in getting your point across. At no time too did I mention that the hunt was badly organised. It was in fact one of the better hunts that I’ve been to in the last two years since I started hunting.
to set the record straight on my team’s ability, we also have had podium finishes in media only hunts, beating the regular top teams. i think the other media teams know and can attest to this. btw, i did not expect this debate to degenerate to the extent that it has. sorry la mike…
Mike said:
Everyone concerned has given their views. Lets move along.
G said:
Dear stop cheating,
There are only 3 teams in the open who scored higher than the media category winning team, and 2 teams tied with them in points. Are insinuating that these 5 teams in the open category had a ‘MoU’ with the winning team in the media category? I shared the same table with them during dinner and they seem to be in a world of their own, no ‘cakap-capak’ with anybody around. Do not pressume others cheated and make baseless accusations without ’solid’ evidence. Be gracious in losing and strive to better the next time. Give them the benefit of doubt and stop bitching !
curious,
Be curious no more, it is possible to arrive 3 hrs ahead of closing time. We arrived 1.45pm, so what say you ?
Patrick - Blurr Squad said:
hey guys…who ever wins - wins la! hunting to our team is not just about winning. We have a damn good time! The hunt is only part of it. We take it as a break and since all of us work in different places, it gives us a chance to get together, have a coupla drinks after the dinner and stuff. If there are those who have to cheat to win … let it be la guys. If they have truly cheated, it will be a matter of time before the truth comes out. Till then, dont la be so stressed out. Just chill and lets just enjoy the outing as a whole! Cheers!!
hunters etc said:
Well said Patrick. Thats the spirit bro!!
ckloh said:
Since most of the teams that partipated in the hunt has voiced their view, it is my turn to voice what I observed.
1) I don’t know whether Close One Eye cheated, I would give benefits of doubt, but to suggest Close One Eye is an ‘unknown’ and it is a ridiculous winning by an unknown team is a bit off marks. The team has done well even in open hunts, not restricted to media hunts alone. And they usually not running on 4.
Please go to www.timeoutsolutions.com. Click View Full Calendar. Browse down and click Results. Click ‘Results For Time Out Challenge To Melaka’.
Close One Eye is on the top 10 of Time Out Non-Master Hunt 2007. I knew a few good teams that can’t make it at top 10 in this hunt. And in the top 10, there is some reputable teams, some have won hunts in KL and Penang, one of them have reach Master status recently and most of the other teams have done well in recent open hunts.
And to run on 3 and to get in the top 10 list, is a rare achievement by ‘unknown team’ as they already became ‘knowned’ by now. Fact is Close One Eye has already been taken note by some of the regular hunt team, not restricted to media hunt only.
2) To suggest MIB is possible cheat is a bit off mark as well.. They are the fifth teams to reach the destination. And logically speaking, if they are helps from the COC or from the other open teams, they should not drop questions from the earlier sector of the hunt at least.
If they is ‘MOU’ or help from the COC, at least logically, they will get all answers correct on the earlier sector. MIB paid a very hefty prices by being ‘fast’ by dropping earlier question, Q9, Pasaraya Ku. From my understanding, they lose on question countback due to dropping questions from the earlier page. This is the risk they need to take by being ‘fast’.
And on the 5 open teams that have the same points and higher than MIB, only 1 teams drop Q9 as well, and to think that this team will have MOU with MIB is way way out, as they are one of the respected team, with respected hunters in the team.
I don’t think it is healthy to accuse the winners without solid proof and with baseless arguments.
Cheers!!
zukri-MiB said:
dear ckloh…
Your points are noted.
We were in fact NOT being fast, perhaps because the questions were relatively easier in as far as Huntmaster Govind Nair’s standard.
Perhaps he was being generous to the hunters, especially families and beginners.
As for an unidentified POS here who had the cheek to suggest that we could have cheated then MiB would like to ask why should we drop questions?
Why did we not have a perfect score since the CoC was a member of our team? Why?
I quote you “To suggest MIB is possible cheat is a bit off the mark as well”.
I would like to tell you that it was not a bit off the mark, it was way of the mark, percisely by kilometers…
As MiB have posted earlier, since we did not question other teams’ position, there should be NO dispute about us as well, and at all!
It was a well-organized hunt and MiB had a great time there in Cherating and we look forward to other hunts.
Thanks ckloh, MiB rest our case. Roger and Out
r said:
without ‘r’ in cherating , you will have really great time
Alam - Blurr Squad said:
People win let them win lah. How they win i don’t want to speculate. If any team cheats to win, let them cheat lah. Dia sendiri tanggung lah satu hari nanti.
The honest ones have a clear conscience. They have peace of mind. They don’t have to worry about getting caught. So let it be lah.
Our team has consistently been in the top three in media hunts. This time we came in fifth. We consider it a poor showing. We blame ourselves because after so many years of hunting, we still screw up on the easiest of questions.
Let’s all strive to improve further rather than blame others, rightly or wrongly, for our failure.
Let’s get over this and look forward to the next hunt. I hope to be at NPC Hunt next month and hope to see all my media brothers and sisters there. Till then, Selamat Memburu.
kereta buruk said:
kwn-kwn,
menang kalah adat pertandingan. semua yang menang top ten kategori media semuanya bagus! tahniahlah pertama, hunt ni memang best, hadiah-hadiah semua best!
apalah said:
the prizes for open and media categories were great. The winners received good money and items. but not the same case for pertama category. The first place winner received only RM500 second RM300 and third RM200. Dont think its fair. pertama members answered the same question mah… dont u people think the winners for pertama category deserve better prizes??
yong said:
Hey.. betullah… hadiah untuk geng pertama tak banyak mana pun… sekurang-kurangnya biarlah lebih sikit. baru dapat share sama adil… tapi, seronok dapat join hunt ni …
dengki said:
Aku cuma nak tahu dua hadiah yang arlan patut dapat tu pergi ke mana.
kartini said:
Kesian group pertama. Hadiah lekeh. Soalan sama, susah senang sama. Bayar kurang sikit. Tapi dapat hadiah kurang banyak. Keadilan apa ini. Kalau nak kemut hadiah baik tak payah ada kategori pertama.
kalah said:
nampak gaya MiB banyak syok sendiri.
meluat said:
dah bosan dengar MiB asyik puji diri … tapi berani sekadar media kategori.. tak pernah dengar masuk open category walaupun orang kuatnya bukan kerja dengan media…
apa pun… ramai dah meluat dengan telatah MiB …
cuba tengok yang menang open category.. tak pernah dengar mereka promote diri …
neng said:
Sedarlah sikit MiB…bukan team u je yang masuk treasure hunt.. semakin ramai yang sudah pandai dan lebih cekap darp team u…
tak payah pukul canang kata team u je bagus …
treng treng said:
Ya lah. MiB juara kampung. Menang kategori media riuh sekampung.
kurang asam said:
Betul ke seorang member MiB dalam AJK Pertama? Kalau betul, MiB tak patut ambil bahagian
kasah said:
Dear dengki,
Kalau nak tahu hadiah selebih untuk arlan pergi ke mana, tanya MiB. Dia serba tahu
greng said:
Kita tunggu MiB tepuk dada jadi juara Open category.
Mike said:
Semua pembaca,
Saya bukan mahu menyekat kebebasan para pembaca memberi komen disini, tetapi sila tumpukan komen, pendapat dan idea anda kepada topik yang sedang dibincangkan atau “treasure hunt” secara umum.
Juga diingatkan seseorang pembaca yang mengunakan pelbagai nama (imping*) tidak digalakkan.
*imping in netspeak is to impersonate or pretend to be some other poster(s) by posting the same view with another handle(name). This is normally done by people who try to dress up their views as though many are in support. This is regarded to be bad nettique.
neuihs said:
would like to ask, is the NPC Hunt (mention above) open to public???
Mike said:
neuihs, yes.
Anti-MiB said:
I setuju dengan kasah,nak tahu mana hadiah selebih nya tanya lah MiB yang serba tahu tu.Baru Media Categori dah riuh satu dunia.Yang i tahu bukan semua MiB ahli Media.Hunters lain tak complain pun dah patut bersyukur.Sedar diri lah MiB ,jangan sombong sangat sampai Hunters yang lain benci.Jangan kerana nila setitik susu sebelanga rosak.
neuihs said:
Mr Mike,
i would like to get more info regarding tis NPC Hunt. Is there any website tat i can log on to????
Mike said:
info not out yet. entry form will be posted here in this blog, once I have them.
orang media said:
Mike,
Jangan risau dengan komen-komen. orang media memang suka menulis. dia orang ni hanya nak lepas geram. MiB pun satu. kalau terror pun tak payah lah canang. Bila canang orang nak geram. sebab tu dia orang attack MiB.
orang media said:
p/s
btw mike, blog u bertambah popular di kalangan orang media. jadi biarlah blog u jadi tempat melepaskan perasaan - tak kira lah perasaan marah, sayang atau benci.
orang media alternatif said:
MIB amarah sbb ada orang suggest team dia tipu…sedangkan yang menipu tu org lain…pasal tu MIB melenting!
Orang lain yang menipu sampai buat mou tau-tau MIB yang dapat nama busuk…mana boleh tak hot? Kalau awak yang kena pastinya awak tidak akan duduk diam kan?
MIB hanya memberi ulasan balas kepada komen orang lain. Baca la turutan peristiwa di atas sebelum membuat kesimpulan…
Nak buat macam mana kan, kalau dah bagus tu ramai la yang dengki..jeles dan geram…adat dunia la…
arlan said:
mike and fellow hunters, sorry to revisit this issue.
we have just been given the other prizes promised to the first-place winner. this came about following the intervention of the pertama exco which felt that winning teams should receive all prizes promised. the exco expressed regret over the incident, saying the decision to cut down on the prizes was made arbitrarily by one person and not communicated to it for approval. as the sponsored prizes were reportedly given to another winning team, the exco bought replacements with their own funds. they would like to put this on record and restore their good name which they feel has been tarnished by the episode. they also wish to bring the matter to a close. thks.